Hey,
I have three repos, all are run by git-annex assistent. Files are synced just fine, but there is one oddity:
florian@horus ~/.synced_configuration (git)-[annex/direct/master] % git annex whereis .zshenv
whereis .zshenv (3 copies)
69902190-d4c1-4abb-a000-f0712769f1cd -- Horus [here]
c7fc42ca-49f7-4688-b81d-c9cfd4a42564 -- Asaru
d5b0586f-32dd-4aae-a7a2-b23d9edd0c32 -- Marduk [marduk]
ok
florian@horus ~/.synced_configuration (git)-[annex/direct/master] % git annex whereis .emacs
whereis .emacs (2 copies)
c7fc42ca-49f7-4688-b81d-c9cfd4a42564 -- Asaru
d5b0586f-32dd-4aae-a7a2-b23d9edd0c32 -- Marduk [marduk]
ok
for .zshenv everything is fine, but why is .emacs not in Horus? Changes from and to Horus are propagated:
florian@horus ~/.synced_configuration (git)-[annex/direct/master] % git annex log .emacs
- Wed, 12 Apr 2017 22:48:03 CEST .emacs | 69902190-d4c1-4abb-a000-f0712769f1cd -- Horus
+ Wed, 12 Apr 2017 22:02:55 CEST .emacs | 69902190-d4c1-4abb-a000-f0712769f1cd -- Horus
+ Wed, 12 Apr 2017 22:02:55 CEST .emacs | d5b0586f-32dd-4aae-a7a2-b23d9edd0c32 -- Marduk [marduk]
- Wed, 12 Apr 2017 22:02:54 CEST .emacs | 69902190-d4c1-4abb-a000-f0712769f1cd -- Horus
- Wed, 12 Apr 2017 22:02:53 CEST .emacs | d5b0586f-32dd-4aae-a7a2-b23d9edd0c32 -- Marduk [marduk]
+ Wed, 12 Apr 2017 22:00:40 CEST .emacs | d5b0586f-32dd-4aae-a7a2-b23d9edd0c32 -- Marduk [marduk]
+ Wed, 12 Apr 2017 22:00:36 CEST .emacs | 69902190-d4c1-4abb-a000-f0712769f1cd -- Horus
Anyone any idea what could be wrong there?
Thanks!
It's strange. I made a change to the file on Horus, it gets propagated to Marduk, but Marduk does not know about. whereis still shows the file is only at Horus. At Asaru the symlink is deleted (so the change info was propagated), but instead there is a symlink on invalid content (like in indirect mode)
The connections are all over SSH: Horus -> Marduk <- Asaru
Sorry, I'm utterly confused...
Your log shows that the .emacs file reached Horus, but was then dropped from it some 46 minutes later.
Something had to drop it. Are you using the git-annex assistant or what?
Sorry, just saw your comment...
Yes, I'm using the assistant, as I pointed out in my original posting. Just right now, I'm having the same situation:
Thanks! Florian